PROMETHEE Analysis
Enter scores per criterion and instantly get a full PROMETHEE I & II ranking with sensitivity analysis.
PROMETHEE II Ranking
Full ranking by net flow (φ = φ⁺ − φ⁻).
PROMETHEE I Ranking
Partial ranking: shows when two alternatives are incomparable.
Sensitivity Analysis
Adjust criterion weights and watch the ranking update in real time.
Detailed Flows
φ⁺ / φ⁻ per alternative and criterion-level contribution.
Free PROMETHEE Analysis Tool — Multi-Criteria Decision Making Online
Need to compare multiple options using several criteria and reach a well-founded decision? PROMETHEE is one of the most trusted multi-criteria decision analysis methods in the world — and now you can run it free, online, no sign-up required.
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) was created by Jean-Pierre Brans in 1982 and extended by Brans & Vincke in 1985. It is widely used in business strategy, engineering, healthcare, finance, supply chain management, and academic research across the globe.
This tool implements PROMETHEE I (partial ranking with incomparability), PROMETHEE II (full linear ranking by net flow), six configurable preference functions, and real-time sensitivity analysis — all in the browser, no spreadsheet, no install.
What is PROMETHEE and how does it work?
PROMETHEE compares alternatives pairwise: for each pair (A, B) and each criterion, it computes a preference function P(A, B) ∈ [0, 1] representing how much A is preferred over B on that criterion.
These values are weighted by criterion importance and aggregated across all pairs. The result is three scores per alternative:
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| φ⁺ (positive outranking flow) | How much this alternative outranks all others on average. Measures its strength. |
| φ⁻ (negative outranking flow) | How much all others outrank this alternative on average. Measures its weakness. |
| φ = φ⁺ − φ⁻ (net flow) | The final balance: the higher, the better the alternative. |
The aggregated preference between two alternatives is:
PROMETHEE I vs PROMETHEE II — what’s the difference?
Both methods start from the same calculations but differ in how they interpret the result:
PROMETHEE II uses the net flow φ to produce a complete linear ranking. Every alternative has a defined position — it is the most direct output for a final decision.
PROMETHEE I compares φ⁺ and φ⁻ separately and only declares superiority when A dominates B in both flows. This produces a partial ranking with three possible relations:
| Relation | Symbol | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Preference | P | A outranks B on both φ⁺ and φ⁻ |
| Indifference | I | A and B are equivalent on both flows |
| Incomparability | R | Flows conflict (e.g. A has higher φ⁺ but also higher φ⁻) |
Incomparability is not a flaw — it is information: it tells you the choice between A and B depends on which aspect you prioritize (strength or tolerance for weaknesses).
When to use which:
- Use PROMETHEE II when you need a definitive ranking to present at a final decision point.
- Use PROMETHEE I when the decision is still open and you want to identify which alternatives are genuinely incomparable.
- Use both (the default in this tool) for a complete analysis.
The 6 preference functions
Each criterion can have a different preference function. This is what sets PROMETHEE apart from plain weighted averages: you define how a difference in value translates into preference.
1 — Usual Any positive difference yields maximum preference. Best for qualitative or binary criteria.
2 — U-shape (parameter: q — indifference threshold) Preference only kicks in if the difference exceeds q. Use when small differences are irrelevant (e.g. minor price variations).
3 — V-shape (parameter: p — full preference threshold) Preference grows linearly from 0 to 1 until p is reached. Good for continuous criteria without an indifference zone.
4 — Level (parameters: q, p) Discrete two-level jump: no preference up to q, partial preference (0.5) between q and p, full preference above p.
5 — Linear (parameters: q, p) — most commonly used No preference up to q, linear growth until p, full preference above p. Combines indifference threshold with gradual scaling.
6 — Gaussian (parameter: σ) Preference grows along a smooth bell curve with no hard cutoff. Ideal for criteria where preference increases progressively.
Criterion weights
The weight wj represents the relative importance of each criterion. The tool normalizes weights automatically so that ∑wj = 1. You can use any scale — what matters is the ratio between weights.
A criterion with weight 4 has twice the influence of one with weight 2.
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis answers: would the result change if I redistributed the weights?
With the weight sliders you can identify:
- Whether the decision is robust — the winner does not change even with significant weight shifts
- Which criterion has the most reversal power — increasing its weight alone can flip the ranking
- Whether there is a dominant alternative (wins under any reasonable weight configuration) or whether the outcome is sensitive to trade-offs
A robust decision is one where different reasonable priority profiles converge to the same winner.
How to use this tool
- Choose the method (PROMETHEE I, II, or both)
- Select a ready-made scenario or click “Custom”
- Set up alternatives (up to 6) and criteria (up to 6): name, weight, direction, and preference function
- Enter scores — can be a 1–10 scale, real values, percentages, or months. Use the same scale within each criterion.
- The ranking appears instantly with φ⁺ / φ⁻ / φ flows and the relations table
- Use the sliders to explore different weight configurations
- Export the report as HTML or PDF to document your decision
Decisions you can analyze with this tool
🚗 Consumer & purchases
- which car to buy best value for money, compare car models multi-criteria analysis
- which phone to buy in 2026, best smartphone cost-benefit comparison
- which laptop to buy for work, laptop performance vs price analysis
- buy or rent or finance a home, multi-criteria real estate decision
- which appliance brand to buy, best home appliance analysis
- new car vs used car which is worth it, car purchase decision framework
💼 Career & work
- which job offer to accept, compare multiple job offers multi-criteria
- full-time vs contractor which is better financially, CLT PJ comparison
- remote work or in-office, best work model for productivity
- is it worth switching careers, career change decision framework
- should i start a business or stay employed, entrepreneurship vs employment analysis
- which candidate to hire, multi-criteria candidate selection PROMETHEE
- which franchise to open, best franchise return on investment analysis
💰 Finance & investment
- where to invest money, compare investments risk return liquidity taxation
- pay off debt or invest, what to prioritize first financial decision
- which bank or digital account to choose, best fintech comparison
- which credit card to get, best cashback miles credit card analysis
- PGBL vs VGBL which pension plan to choose, retirement plan comparison
- which loan to take, personal loan vs payroll loan comparison
🎓 Education
- which graduate program to take, MBA vs masters vs bootcamp comparison
- which online course or platform to choose, best e-learning platform comparison
- which college major or university to choose, degree selection framework
- best country for a study abroad program, exchange destination comparison
🚀 Business & technology
- how to choose a supplier or vendor, supplier selection PROMETHEE analysis
- which software tool to use for the team, SaaS platform comparison
- best cloud provider to choose, AWS vs Google Cloud vs Azure PROMETHEE
- which frontend framework to use, React vs Vue vs Angular comparison
- microservices vs monolith architecture decision, system design trade-off analysis
- agile methodology selection, Scrum vs Kanban decision framework
📊 Prioritization & strategy
- how to prioritize product features, what to build first in the product
- OKR prioritization, which goals to focus on for the quarter
- marketing campaign prioritization, where to invest the marketing budget
- hiring decision multi-criteria, which candidate best fits the team
🔬 Academic & research
- PROMETHEE method online free, how to run PROMETHEE I and II analysis
- multi-criteria decision analysis online free, MADM tool no download required
- PROMETHEE sensitivity analysis online, how criterion weights affect rankings
- outranking method case study, PROMETHEE example with preference functions
- decision support system free, weighted scoring model vs PROMETHEE comparison
- operations research decision tool, MCDA software free online
Was this tool helpful?
Your feedback is anonymous and helps improve this and other UtiliBox tools.
Found an issue?